|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
Deception under 'The Law' (link to a brief compilation at *human-rights* HomeSite) is an indictable offence esprecially when the intent is to secure pecuniary advantage for third parties at the expens of another.
VERY IMPORTANT FACT TO NOTE:
In the course of the proceedings that led to the 'guilty verdict' ((as organised and arranged by the director and the actors who took part in the execution of pre-scripted scenarios as in the THE JUDITH WARD - CASE (Link to *human-rights* HomeSite)) the Jury, on Tuesday 24 April 2001, requested for copies of the communications that I was sending to every organisation and persons that I considered might be able to intervene and introduce 'sanity and respect for law and rights in the matters that the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies created following the demise of my friend. It was simply a case of income generation and the usual practices 'in pursuit of assets targeted for conversion to legal costs' through abuse of the courts' facilities.
In response to the Jury's request, the judge in control of the production simply told the jury that in due course they would be afforded opportunities to view that which they had requested. He finished his long contemptuous address to the jury with the words " ...and if I forget nudge me". In the meantime the Jury had not been issued with any bundles of documents which the jurors coulde relate and refer to in the course of the proceedings.
By the close of the day's proceedings on Wednesday the Judge had brushed even the explicit request from the Jury under the carpets. In the circumstances, in the morning of Thursday 26 April 2001 the founder of *human-rights* who had been observing the production (alleged proccedings proper) from the public gallery decoided to intervene and attended the clerk of the Court and handed to her copies of:
1. The fax transmission published below and
2. A copy of the letter to the Editor of the Daily Express (one of the numerous national newspaper editors contacted by human-rights).
The EXPLICIT Fax communication, below, the court with intent (as determined by the director of the theatrical production) was suppressed and not handed to the Jury, as they requested on 24 April 2001 and or as the founder of the *human-rights* Non Governmental Organisation demanded in the morning of 26th April 2001 when he intervned in the proceedings.
Note:
A. The date of the document which I faxed to *human-rights*. Note also he fact that steps were taken by the organisation and founder immediately, br referring to the copy of the letter published below. The issues that arose after the illegal assault by the police, had been and repeteadly were referred to 'a number of editors of national newspapers and to the government. Not one single person, organosation and or government department contacted me or *human-rights* to indicate or express any interest in the issues.
B. The clear and succinct statement in the fax, paragraph numbered 2, the THE JURY WAS NOT PERMITTED ACCESS TO. They were not afforded the right to read it and to use their common sense as you, the visitor are invited to do, now. Indeed the Jury had also been OBSTRUCTED from access to many other truths, facts and realities. They were simply fed with falsehoods and exaggerated scenarios which the script writers developed and even created out of other material they used against me. You, th visitors will be afforded the opportunity to use your powers of observation and common sense through which to determine, the quality of service the Law Enforcement Agencies in our country provide for themselves and their circles through gross minconduct in public office.
AS FAR AS DIRECTOR AND ACTORS were oncerned the contemporaneous evidence was immaterial and irrelevant but that which the actors and the directors created over a twelve month period that can only be referred to as a typical scenario spun by persons who abuse their public office and the facilities at their disposal through their 'independence of the restraints of law' prerogatives.
The copy of the letter faxed to the editor of the Daily Express by *human-rights* on the same day as the founder received my fax (above) clarifies a number of issues and the approach by *human-rights*.
The conclusion, "...both have been seen to be operating outside the law" was and remains based on well documented cases that the media barons were made aware of and evn more so since the advent of the blatant FORGERIES FOR THEFT OF FUNDS, belonging to others, as exposed at *human-rights* in the National Scandal pages. Rampant Institutionalised Fraud and Corruption through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds entrusted t Local Authorities, as 'arranged by central government' and stole misapprpropriated as arranged by the dishonest who misconduct in public office through occupation of judicial chairs and convenient lack of knowledge of any law. ALL endorsed through silence by the condescending media barons, their editors and the stooges deployed to blame editorial control for the blunt failures to inform the public of the facts of life in an alleged democratic state allegedly resting and founded on law and order.
PUBLISHED below the 'The Times' of 28 June 2001, the headlines "Archer avoids witness box". Note the underlined text and succinct words by HH Judge.
Consider the document / declaration "Our Aims" published at the *human-rights* HomeSite (link at the top of the HomePage) and consider the well known addage: "What is good for the goose is good for the gander" and note that the offence od deception for pecuniary advantage happens to be an indictale offence. The riminals who indulged at the expense of Judith Ward wrre never prosecuted, care of the arrangements between the abusers of public office, who indulge at the expense of Mr and Mrs Average who meet through taxes their fat salaries.
As more evidence is published by me and other members of *The human-rights.org Community On Line* in our web-pages it shall be the responsibility of the Ministers in charge of the Investigative branch of the Law and he Judiciary to ensure that prosecutions of the criminals who indulge in the sysrtematic abuse of the courts' facilities are undertaken and or at the very least persons who took and take part in the constructive frauds, as indulged in my case are removed from office and that they are also denied their fat pensions and made to live on state hand outs like they impose through abuse of their public office on the victims they target with impunity in contempt of 'The Law'.
MORE EVIDENCE to follow, as I prepare for my appeal against conviction. The legal professions are being asked to undertake diligent perusal of the evidence and with all due reference also to the challenges being prepared by me and persons who are assisting me in the fight for and towards the restoration on my rights, as provided by law.